These sources ground the language-domain emphasis across our modules — from phonology and morphology to syntax, semantics, vocabulary, and the background knowledge that comprehension depends on. They also form the evidence base for the course Word Knowledge Is World Knowledge.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Cabell, S. Q., & Hwang, H. (2020). Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades.
Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S99–S107.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.338Capin, P., Dahl-Leonard, K., Hall, C., Yoon, N. Y., Cho, E., Chatzoglou, E., Reiley, S., Walker, M., Shanahan, E., Andress, T., & Vaughn, S. (2025). Reading comprehension instruction: Evaluating our progress since Durkin’s seminal study.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 29(1), 85–114.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2024.2418582Catts, H. W. (2022). Rethinking how to promote reading comprehension. American Educator, 45(4), 26–33, 40.
Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., & Kapp, S. (2007). Vocabulary intervention for kindergarten students: Comparing extended instruction to embedded instruction and incidental exposure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2), 74–88.
Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Loftus, S., Zipoli, R., Ruby, M., Crevecoeur, Y. C., & Kapp, S. (2010). Direct and extended vocabulary instruction in kindergarten: Investigating transfer effects.
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(2), 93–120.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19345741003592410Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Ware, S., Austin, C. R., Loftus-Rattan, S. M., & Baker, D. L. (2019). Racing against the vocabulary gap: Matthew effects in early vocabulary instruction and intervention.
Exceptional Children, 85(2), 163–179.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918789162Eberhardt, N. C., & Gillis, M. (2025). Teaching syntax: What teachers are asking—Part 2. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 51(2), 24–28.
Fricke, S., Bowyer-Crane, C., Haley, A. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Efficacy of language intervention in the early years.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(3), 280–290.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12010Fricke, S., Burgoyne, K., Bowyer-Crane, C., Kyriacou, M., Zosimidou, A., Maxwell, L., Lervåg, A., Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2017). The efficacy of early language intervention in mainstream school settings: A randomized controlled trial.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(10), 1141–1151.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12737Haynes, C. W., & Jennings, T. M. (2006). Listening and speaking: Essential ingredients for teaching struggling writers. Perspectives, Spring 2006, 12–16. International Dyslexia Association.
Kim, J. S., Gilbert, J. B., Relyea, J. E., Rich, P., Scherer, E., Burkhauser, M. A., & Tvedt, J. N. (2024). Time to transfer: Long-term effects of a sustained and spiraled content literacy intervention in the elementary grades.
Developmental Psychology, 60(7), 1279–1297.
https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001710Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Peng, P., Wang, W., Filderman, M. J., Zhang, W., & Lin, L. (2024). The active ingredient in reading comprehension strategy intervention for struggling readers: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Review of Educational Research, 94(2), 228–267.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231171345Walker, M. A., Capin, P., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Students with reading difficulties who are English learners. In C. M. Connor & P. McCardle (Eds.), Advances in reading intervention: Research to practice to research (pp. 167–180). Brookes Publishing.
References follow APA 7th edition. Last updated August 2026.